Understanding without Justification and Belief?
Cited 0 times inCited 0 times in
- Understanding without Justification and Belief?
- Park, Seungbae
- Acceptance, Belief, Justification, Knowledge, Moore’s Paradox, Understanding
- Issue Date
- Federal University of Santa Catarina
- Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, v.21, no.3, pp.379 - 389
- Dellsén (2016a) argues that understanding requires neither justification nor belief. I object that ridding understanding of justification and belief comes with the following costs. (i) No claim about the world can be inferred from what we understand. (ii) We run into either Moore’s paradox or certain disconcerting questions. (iii) Understanding does not represent the world. (iv) Understanding cannot take the central place in epistemology. (v) Understanding cannot be invoked to give an account of scientific progress. (vi) It is not clear how misunderstanding arises.
- ; Go to Link
Appears in Collections:
- DGS_Journal Papers
- Files in This Item:
can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.