File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 8 -
dc.citation.startPage 821 -
dc.citation.title REMOTE SENSING -
dc.citation.volume 9 -
dc.contributor.author Jang, Eunna -
dc.contributor.author Im, Jungho -
dc.contributor.author Park, Geun-Ha -
dc.contributor.author Park, Young-Gyu -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T21:51:01Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T21:51:01Z -
dc.date.created 2017-09-18 -
dc.date.issued 2017-08 -
dc.description.abstract The ocean is closely related to global warming and on-going climate change by regulating amounts of carbon dioxide through its interaction with the atmosphere. The monitoring of ocean carbon dioxide is important for a better understanding of the role of the ocean as a carbon sink, and regional and global carbon cycles. This study estimated the fugacity of carbon dioxide (fCO(2)) over the East Sea located between Korea and Japan. In situ measurements, satellite data and products from the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) and the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) reanalysis data were used through stepwise multi-variate nonlinear regression (MNR) and two machine learning approaches (i.e., support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF)). We used five ocean parameters-colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM; <0.3 m(-1)), chlorophyll-a concentration (Chl-a; <21 mg/m(3)), mixed layer depth (MLD; <160 m), sea surface salinity (SSS; 32-35), and sea surface temperature (SST; 8-28 degrees C)-and four band reflectance (Rrs) data (400 nm-565 nm) and their ratios as input parameters to estimate surface seawater fCO(2) (270-430 mu atm). Results show that RF generally performed better than stepwise MNR and SVR. The root mean square error (RMSE) of validation results by RF was 5.49 mu atm (1.7%), while those of stepwise MNR and SVR were 10.59 mu atm (3.2%) and 6.82 mu atm (2.1%), respectively. Ocean parameters (i.e., sea surface salinity (SSS), sea surface temperature (SST), and mixed layer depth (MLD)) appeared to contribute more than the individual bands or band ratios from the satellite data. Spatial and seasonal distributions of monthly fCO(2) produced from the RF model and sea-air CO2 flux were also examined. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation REMOTE SENSING, v.9, no.8, pp.821 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/rs9080821 -
dc.identifier.issn 2072-4292 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85028300511 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/22715 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/8/821 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000408605600059 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher MDPI AG -
dc.title Estimation of Fugacity of Carbon Dioxide in the East Sea Using In Situ Measurements and Geostationary Ocean Color Imager Satellite Data -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Remote Sensing -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Remote Sensing -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor fugacity of CO2 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor GOCI -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor HYCOM -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor machine learning -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor multi-variate nonlinear regression -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SURFACE-WATER -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ULLEUNG BASIN -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CO2 FLUXES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PARTIAL-PRESSURE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RANDOM FOREST -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PCO(2) -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FCO(2) -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CLASSIFICATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ALGORITHMS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SYSTEM -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.