File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2017-07
DOI
10.1515/humaff-2017-0024
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/22435
Fulltext
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/humaff.2017.27.issue-3/humaff-2017-0024/humaff-2017-0024.xml?format=INT
Citation
HUMAN AFFAIRS, v.27, no.3, pp.289 - 300
Abstract
It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from driving cars, living in apartments, and wearing makeup, for the welfare of animals. If all animals are equal, and if nonhuman omnivores, such as bears and baboons, are justified in killing the members of other species, such as gazelles and buffaloes, for food, humans are also justified in killing the members of other species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens, for food. In addition, it is fair for humans to eat animals because humans are also eaten by animals.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
ISSN
1210-3055

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.