File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

김병민

Kim, Byungmin
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Research Group
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 9 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -
dc.citation.volume 142 -
dc.contributor.author Groholski, David R. -
dc.contributor.author Hashash, Youssef M. A. -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Byungmin -
dc.contributor.author Musgrove, Michael -
dc.contributor.author Harmon, Joseph -
dc.contributor.author Stewart, Jonathan P. -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T23:12:32Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T23:12:32Z -
dc.date.created 2017-02-25 -
dc.date.issued 2016-09 -
dc.description.abstract Commonly used simplified one-dimensional nonlinear seismic site response analyses employ constitutive models based on a variation of the hyperbolic model to represent the initial stress-strain backbone curve. Desirable features of the backbone curve include provision of (1) an initial shear modulus at zero shear strain, (2) a limiting shear stress at large shear strains, and (3) flexible control of the nonlinear behavior between those boundary conditions. Available hyperbolic models have combinations of two of these features. A new general quadratic/hyperbolic (GQ/H) model is developed from the bivariate quadratic equation to provide all desired features. Nonlinear behavior is controlled by a shear-strain-dependent curve-fitting function. The model's unload-reload rules and coupling with pore-water pressure generation are also presented. Several total-stress site response analyses are presented to demonstrate the performance of the GQ/H model relative to a commonly used hyperbolic model in which the maximum shear stress cannot be defined. The analyses show the importance of properly representing the maximum shear stress in the constitutive model because it may lead to underestimation or overestimation of the computed site response. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, v.142, no.9 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001496 -
dc.identifier.issn 1090-0241 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/21426 -
dc.identifier.url http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001496 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000384439300005 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS -
dc.title Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.