File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 9 -
dc.citation.startPage 686 -
dc.citation.title REMOTE SENSING -
dc.citation.volume 8 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Sanggyun -
dc.contributor.author Im, Jungho -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jinwoo -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Miae -
dc.contributor.author Shin, Minso -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Hyun-cheol -
dc.contributor.author Quackenbush, Lindi J. -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T23:12:39Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T23:12:39Z -
dc.date.created 2016-12-09 -
dc.date.issued 2016-09 -
dc.description.abstract Satellite altimeters have been used to monitor Arctic sea ice thickness since the early 2000s. In order to estimate sea ice thickness from satellite altimeter data, leads (i.e., cracks between ice floes) should first be identified for the calculation of sea ice freeboard. In this study, we proposed novel approaches for lead detection using two machine learning algorithms: decision trees and random forest. CryoSat-2 satellite data collected in March and April of 2011-2014 over the Arctic region were used to extract waveform parameters that show the characteristics of leads, ice floes and ocean, including stack standard deviation, stack skewness, stack kurtosis, pulse peakiness and backscatter sigma-0. The parameters were used to identify leads in the machine learning models. Results show that the proposed approaches, with overall accuracy >90%, produced much better performance than existing lead detection methods based on simple thresholding approaches. Sea ice thickness estimated based on the machine learning-detected leads was compared to the averaged Airborne Electromagnetic (AEM)-bird data collected over two days during the CryoSat Validation experiment (CryoVex) field campaign in April 2011. This comparison showed that the proposed machine learning methods had better performance (up to r = 0.83 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.29 m) compared to thickness estimation based on existing lead detection methods (RMSE = 0.86-0.93 m). Sea ice thickness based on the machine learning approaches showed a consistent decline from 2011-2013 and rebounded in 2014. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation REMOTE SENSING, v.8, no.9, pp.686 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/rs8090698 -
dc.identifier.issn 2072-4292 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85000352309 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/20935 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/9/698 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000385488000008 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher MDPI AG -
dc.title Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Estimation from CryoSat-2 Satellite Data Using Machine Learning-Based Lead Detection -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Remote Sensing -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Remote Sensing -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor CryoSat-2 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor lead detection -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor sea ice thickness -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor machine learning -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SURFACE-TEMPERATURE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ELEVATION CHANGE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CLIMATE REGIONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RANDOM FORESTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LIDAR DATA -
dc.subject.keywordPlus IN-SITU -
dc.subject.keywordPlus OCEAN -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FREEBOARD -
dc.subject.keywordPlus IMAGERY -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.