File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Uniformity Principle vs. the Disuniformity Principle

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2017-06
DOI
10.1007/s12136-016-0302-3
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/20156
Fulltext
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-016-0302-3
Citation
ACTA ANALYTICA-INTERNATIONAL PERIODICAL FOR PHILOSOPHY IN THE ANALYTICAL TRADITION, v.32, no.2, pp.213 - 222
Abstract
The pessimistic induction is built upon the uniformity principle that the future resembles the past. In daily scientific activities, however, scientists sometimes rely on what I call the disuniformity principle that the future differs from the past. They do not give up their research projects despite the repeated failures. They believe that they will succeed although they failed repeatedly, and as a result they achieve what they intended to achieve. Given that the disuniformity principle is useful in certain cases in science, we might reasonably use it to infer that present theories are true unlike past theories. Hence, pessimists have the burden to show that our prediction about the fate of present theories is more likely to be true if we use the uniformity principle than if we use the disuniformity principle.
Publisher
SPRINGER
ISSN
0353-5150

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.