File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 1472 -
dc.citation.number 11 -
dc.citation.startPage 1462 -
dc.citation.title ERGONOMICS -
dc.citation.volume 59 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Songil -
dc.contributor.author Kyung, Gyouhyung -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Jungyoung -
dc.contributor.author Moon, Seung Ki -
dc.contributor.author Park, Kyoung Jong -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T23:08:55Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T23:08:55Z -
dc.date.created 2016-03-30 -
dc.date.issued 2016-11 -
dc.description.abstract Recently, some smartphones have introduced index finger interaction functions on the rear surface. The current study investigated the effects of task type, phone width, and hand length on grasp, index finger reach zone, discomfort, and muscle activation during such interaction. We considered five interaction tasks (neutral, comfortable, maximum, vertical, and horizontal strokes), two device widths (60 and 90 mm) and three hand lengths. Horizontal (vertical) strokes deviated from the horizontal axis in the range from -10.8 degrees to -13.5 degrees (81.6-88.4 degrees). Maximum strokes appeared to be excessive as these caused 43.8% greater discomfort than did neutral strokes. The 90-mm width also appeared to be excessive as it resulted in 12.3% increased discomfort relative to the 60-mm width. The small-hand group reported 11.9-18.2% higher discomfort ratings, and the percent maximum voluntary exertion of their flexor digitorum superficialis muscle, pertaining to index finger flexion, was also 6.4% higher. These findings should be considered to make smartphone rear interaction more comfortable.

Practitioner Summary: Among neutral, comfortable, maximum, horizontal, and vertical index finger strokes on smartphone rear surfaces, maximum vs. neutral strokes caused 43.8% greater discomfort. Horizontal (vertical) strokes deviated from the horizontal (vertical) axis. Discomfort increased by 12.3% with 90-mm-vs. 60-mm-wide devices. Rear interaction regions of five commercialised smartphones should be lowered 20 to 30 mm for more comfortable rear interaction.
-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ERGONOMICS, v.59, no.11, pp.1462 - 1472 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/00140139.2016.1146346 -
dc.identifier.issn 0014-0139 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84961204026 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/18907 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139.2016.1146346 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000387999400007 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD -
dc.title Grasp and index finger reach zone during one-handed smartphone rear interaction: effects of task type, phone width and hand length -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Industrial; Ergonomics; Psychology, Applied; Psychology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering; Psychology -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor One-handed smartphone interaction -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor index finger interaction -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor rear interaction -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor %MVE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MODELS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MUSCLE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus UNITS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.