File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조경화

Cho, Kyung Hwa
Water-Environmental Informatics Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 850 -
dc.citation.number 6 -
dc.citation.startPage 846 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-CHINA -
dc.citation.volume 22 -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Kyung Hwa -
dc.contributor.author Han, Dukki -
dc.contributor.author Park, Yongeun -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Seung Won -
dc.contributor.author Cha, Sung Min -
dc.contributor.author Kang, Joo-Hyon -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Joon Ha -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T07:07:50Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T07:07:50Z -
dc.date.created 2016-03-10 -
dc.date.issued 2010-06 -
dc.description.abstract Most probable number (MPN) and colony-forming unit (CFU) estimates of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentration are common measures of water quality in aquatic environments. Thus, FIB intensively monitored in Yeongsan Watershed in an attempt to compare two different methods and to develop a statistical model to convert from CFU to MPN estimates or vice versa. As a result, the significant difference was found in the MPN and CFU estimates. The enumerated Escherichia coli concentrations in MPN are greater than those in CFU, except for the measurement in winter. Especially in fall, E. coli concentrations in MPN are one order of magnitude greater than that in CFU. Contrarily, enterococci bacteria in MPN are lower than those in CFU. However, in general, a strongly positive relationship are found between MPN and CFU estimates. Therefore, the statistical models were developed, and showed the reasonable converting FIB concentrations from CFU estimates to MPN estimates. We expect this study will provide preliminary information towards future research on whether different analysis methods may result in different water quality standard violation frequencies for the same water sample. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-CHINA, v.22, no.6, pp.846 - 850 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60187-X -
dc.identifier.issn 1001-0742 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-77953715338 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/18772 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100107420960187X -
dc.identifier.wosid 000278834400009 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher SCIENCE PRESS -
dc.title Evaluation of the relationship between two different methods for enumeration fecal indicator bacteria: Colony-forming unit and most probable number -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.