File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 201 -
dc.citation.number 1-2 -
dc.citation.startPage 191 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE -
dc.citation.volume 201 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Sangyoup -
dc.contributor.author Park, Gunyoung -
dc.contributor.author Amy, Gary -
dc.contributor.author Hong, Seung-Kwang -
dc.contributor.author Moon, Seung-Hyeon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Duck-Hee -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Jaeweon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T11:38:16Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T11:38:16Z -
dc.date.created 2015-06-30 -
dc.date.issued 2002-05 -
dc.description.abstract The objective of this study was to develop a new measurement technique for the determination of pore size distributions (PSDs) of polymeric and ceramic membranes, including NF, UF, and MF membranes. The proposed method uses the fractional rejection (FR) concept of a solute in membrane pores. Experimental measurements were conducted using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) columns and a refractive index (RI) detector. A specially designed membrane filtration unit was also used. Two different macromolecules, including nonionic polyethylene glycols (PEG) and natural organic matter (NOM) with ionizable functional (carboxylic and phenolic) groups, were used as solutes. Membrane PSDs, determined with PEG and NOM, can be defined as absolute and effective membrane PSDs, respectively. Two different types of membranes (flat-sheet polymeric and tubular ceramic) were used in this work. Experimental procedures include three major steps: (1) measurements of relative molecular mass (RMM) distributions of solutes included in the membrane feed and corresponding permeate, (2) the calculation of solute FR, and (3) PSD determination. The main results and advantages of this method are: (1) the PSD of various membranes with different pore sizes can be measured using a relatively easy method without significant limitations of pore size and membrane type; (2) various factors that affect membrane PSD, including pH, ionic strength, ion binding, and hydrodynamics, can also be evaluated; (3) the effective PSD of membranes with negatively-charged surfaces, and which exhibit significant shifts in PSD towards the lower RMM region can also be determined. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, v.201, no.1-2, pp.191 - 201 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00729-3 -
dc.identifier.issn 0376-7388 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-0037204914 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11928 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738801007293 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000174688300016 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV -
dc.title Determination of membrane pore size distribution using the fractional rejection of nonionic and charged macromolecules -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.