File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 3399 -
dc.citation.number 15 -
dc.citation.startPage 3393 -
dc.citation.title ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 36 -
dc.contributor.author Her, Namguk -
dc.contributor.author Amy, Gary -
dc.contributor.author Foss, David -
dc.contributor.author Cho, JW -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T11:37:17Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T11:37:17Z -
dc.date.created 2015-06-30 -
dc.date.issued 2002-08 -
dc.description.abstract High performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) with ultraviolet absorbance (UVA) detection has been widely utilized to estimate the molecular weight (MW) and MW distribution of natural organic matter (NOM). However the estimation of MW with UVA detection is inherently inaccurate because UVA at 254 nm only detects limited components (mostly pi bonded molecules) of NOM, and the molar absorptivity of these different NOM constituents is not equal. In comparison, a SEC chromatogram obtained with a DOC detector showed significant differences compared to a corresponding UVA chromatogram, resulting in different MW values as well as different estimates of polydispersivity. The MWs of Suwannee River humic acid (SRHA), Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA), and various mixtures thereof were estimated with HPSEC coupled with UVA and DOC detectors, The results show that UVA is not an adequate detector for quantitative analysis of MW estimation but rather can be used only for limited qualitative analysis. The NOM in several natural waters (Irvine Ranch, California groundwater, and Barr Lake, Colorado surface water) were also characterized to demonstrate the different MWs obtained with the two detectors. The results of the SEC-DOC chromatograms revealed NOM constituent peaks that went undetected by UVA. Utilizing online DOC detection, a better representation of NOM MWs was suggested, with NOM displaying higher weight-averaged MW (M-w) and lower number-averaged MW (M-n) as well as higher polydispersivity. A method for estimation of the MWs of NOM fractional components and polydispersivitiesis presented -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, v.36, no.15, pp.3393 - 3399 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1021/es015649y -
dc.identifier.issn 0013-936X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-0036667546 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11926 -
dc.identifier.url http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es015649y -
dc.identifier.wosid 000177242600048 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher AMER CHEMICAL SOC -
dc.title Variations of molecular weight estimation by HP-size exclusion chromatography with UVA versus online DOC detection -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.